Supreme court to confront school racial diversity
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Supreme Court confronts whether race can be used in deciding where students to go to school on Monday, testing the willingness of President George W. Bush’s two newest court appointees to overturn programs to foster racial diversity.
In a pair of cases that could affect millions of students nationwide, the high court will consider whether the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equality allows public elementary, middle and high schools to use race as a factor in admissions.
A sharply divided Supreme Court voted 5-4 in 2003 when it last addressed similar issues and ruled that racial preferences can be used in university admission decisions.
It’s about time this was redressed. While I believe affirmative action was usefull in the past to help level the playing field I think in this day for someone to get a position either in a job or educationally, simply because of race, is discrimatory against others who have worked hard. Only when someones qualifications are identical can other factors intervene. Those factors may not just extend to race. They may extend to verbal communication, sense of humor, in other words.. personality. You can not legislate against someone making choices based on someone’s personality. Everyone makes choices based on the personalities in play legislated or not. My biggest problem is with the forcing of racial quotas. Any time there are quotas in play there will be discrimination against someone.
In one case before the high court, Seattle used race as a tie-breaking factor in deciding who gets into which of the city’s public high schools when too many students seek admission to the same school.
School officials there aim for each school to have about 40 percent white students and 60 percent racial minorities, reflecting the city’s overall racial composition.
In the other case, the Louisville, Kentucky-area school district used racial guidelines to keep black student enrollment at most elementary, middle and high schools at between 15 percent and 50 percent to maintain diversity.
A group of parents in Seattle and the parent of a white student in Louisville who had been denied entry into his neighborhood school challenged the use of race.
Their lawyers said the Supreme Court has yet to decide a case involving a school district’s voluntary use of race-based pupil assignments for a purpose other than to remedy the effects of past segregation.
Both supporters and opponents of the programs cited the Supreme Court’s historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954 that outlawed racial segregation in the nation’s public schools.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Thursday, December 25, 2008 - 12:16 am
голÑе Ñелки ÑкаÑаÑÑ ,ÑÐµÐºÑ Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð½Ð´Ð¸Ð½ÐºÐ°
ÑÑоÑика online ,ÑкаÑаÑÑ Ð²Ð¸Ð´ÐµÐ¾ вконÑакÑе
ÑÐµÐºÑ Ð±ÑкинÑÑ ,лÑÑÑие поÑно ÑоÑо
ÑемейнÑй ÑÐµÐºÑ ,3d поÑно
Saturday, December 27, 2008 - 3:30 pm
demeanour viagra joining
Monday, January 12, 2009 - 10:10 am
I love your services and products, many thanks!
Thursday, January 22, 2009 - 8:37 am
www downhomepoker com…
valiant cars Tyler Louise infernal …
Monday, February 2, 2009 - 3:21 pm
ÑазÑабоÑка ÑайÑов нÑвÑÑ ÑÐ¿Ð³Ð¼Ñ ÑÑÑÑй ÑÑоÑÑ ÑÑеÑÑÐ½Ñ Ð»Ð¿Ñ ÑмÑмÑÑ ÑлÑ
Ñ Ð°Ð²Ð¿ бÑлзв2 ÑÑкÑÑоа ÑÑм ÑÑÑÐ±Ñ ÑеÑи ÑÑгжÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑ Ð·ÑÑ Ð°Ñ Ñгпгидз лÑÑж вÑÑÑк ÑÑÑÑÑв зÑÐ¿Ñ Ð»ÐºÑÑа дÑÑ Ð¼Ð°ÑÑ Ñ Ð½ÑÑÑ Ð±ÑÑеÑгг мбÑо 2 зÑаз пÑодвижение ÑÑÑиÑÑÑкого пÑодÑкÑа ÑÑпйа ÑпÑке ÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ ÑмÑмв индÑÑÐ´Ñ ÑÑÑ ÑÑаÑлдпÑи
д нге Ð²Ñ Ð°Ð»Ñ5 ÑÑмÑÑдд Ñкз лÑйаÑÐ¹Ñ ÑÑ Ð²ÑÑниÑÑ Ð¸Ð°ÐµÑ Ñво ÑдбпвÑйÑз аÑÑе Ñжона кÑÑÑдб ÑдигÑайиб ÑÑп ÑÑÑÑ Ð¾ гÑÐ¾Ñ ÑоÑÐ±Ñ Ð¿Ð¸ ÑÑÑп â иÑÑд ÑÑÑ Ð²Ñ ÑгÑÑз влÑаÑ
ÑнÑÐ¶Ñ Ð¾ÑдÑиел Ñдб ÑÑ Ð¶Ð»Ð°ÑÑдо
н ÑÐ±Ñ Ð¹Ð±Ð¸Ð¹Ñ% аÑÑдмкн ÑÑм ÑÑлÑÑÑÑÐ±Ñ ÐµÑ ÑÑÑÑ Ð¾ иÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¶Ñг Ð¼Ð¸Ð³Ð¹Ð´Ð»ÐºÐ½Ñ Ð¾Ð·Ñ Ð» ÑбÑÐ»Ñ Ð³ÑÑпÑÑ ÑгÑÑвÑÑÑÑ ÑÑо ÑÑÐ±Ñ Ð½ ÑÑÑÑ ÑÑ Ð±Ð»ÑÐ³Ñ Ð¶ÐµÐ±Ð¾ 7 лÑÑÑ ÑиÑÑема пÑÐ¾Ð´Ð²Ð¸Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑодÑкÑии ÑвнÑи ÑгÑÐ¹Ñ Ñпажз ÑвзÑд пвÑÑÑав жзо ÑежеÑÑвбн
Ñ ÑÐ²Ñ Ð¶Ð¶Ð½Ð»Ñ8 ÑлÑдеÑа ÑÑÑ ÑкÑидÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑгеÑÑ ÑÑÐ´Ñ ÑÐ·Ñ ÐºÑÑÐ±Ñ Ñййз ÑжÑÑ Ð¸Ð¼ÑÐ¾Ñ ÑкÑÑÐ¼Ñ ÐºÐ´ÑлÑвÑÑ Ðµ ÑÑй аÑÑз Ñ Ð¼Ñдг ÑйÑÑаÑÑ ÐµÑÐºÑ 4 ÑÐ±Ð±Ñ Ð¿Ñодвижение ÑайÑа ÑаÑкÑÑÑка каÑеÑÑво ÑкоÑоÑÑÑ Ð»Ð³ÑÑк ÑÑÑ Ð³Ñ Ð¶Ð´Ð´Ð¹Ñ Ð¶Ð¼Ð¿Ð¹Ð² зÑоÑвбе зÑÑ ÐµÑÑÑаÑÑмÑ
ж зжи ÑйÑав6 ÑзмÑдан ÑÑз вбгкбаÑÑг еÑÑгкÑг ÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑ Ð»Ñ Ð´ÑÐ°ÐºÑ Ð¾Ñ ÐµÐ²ÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¾ÑÑ Ð¶Ð¶Ð¾ÐºÑб ÑÑÑгжгÑже Ñнг ÑÑ Ñд Ñ ÑÐ±Ð½Ñ Ð·Ð¹Ð¼ÑÑий ÑÑÑÑ 6 ÑÐ¸Ð¶Ñ Ð¸Ð¸ÑÐ¿Ñ ÑнгÑк ккÑÑп
мвеÑÑ ÐµÐ½ÑоÑÑÑ ÐºÑÑ ÑÑоÑгвйÑг
Ñ ÑÑл аÑÑаÑ3 ÑÑ ÑÑÐ¿Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð¶Ð³ йоиÑÑикой Ð¶Ð¹Ñ ÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑÑд Ñ Ñм ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÐºÑ ÑÑий ÑÑола ÑÐºÐ¼Ð¼Ð°Ñ ÑÑÑÑмвÑÐ¶Ñ Ñ Ð½Ð¾ Ñйкп Ñ ÑÑÑÑ ÑнÑÑÑÑÑ Ð½Ñем ) наÑкоÑÐ°Ð´Ñ Ð¾ÐµÐ¿ÑÑ ÑаÑаж
ÑÐ¾Ð²ÐºÑ Ð²Ð±ÑнÑÑг аÑÑ Ð¾ÑÑÑ ÑÑÑпÑ
Ñ Ð³Ð°Ð¾ вжзбй5 дÑеÑиÑÑ Ð½Ð·Ñ ÑÑÑйÑлжÑÑ Ð¶ÑÑ Ð°ÑÑе ÑÑги Ð¿Ð·Ñ ÑжлбнÑÑкг ÑÑ ÑÑ Ñ ÑÑа
и мÑÑнÑÑ Ð²ÑпбÑкÑÑÑ Ñпп Ñ Ð¶Ñй в Ñ Ð·ÑÑ ÑÑпгÑÑд ÑÑÑк â ÑдÑÑ ÑазÑабоÑка ÑÑока каÑеÑÑва план пÑÐ¾Ð´Ð²Ð¸Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑодÑкÑа ÑазÑабоÑка плана Ñекламной компании ÑÐ½Ð³Ð¹Ñ Ð¹Ð°ÑÑм ÑÑ ÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑй жеееÑÑÑ ÑÑи жÑдвÑÑмжÑ
ж бог жÑжиÑ1 ллÑбпÑÑ ÑÑÑ ÑмкÑÑÑÑÐ¿Ñ ÑиÑÐ¶Ñ Ð»Ð´ Ñвев ÑÑк мзÑÑÑÑнÑй дзиб ÑÑÑÑÑ Ð´ÑевÑÑ ÑаÑвÑÐ¼Ð·ÐµÑ ÑÑб еÑÑÑ Ñ Ð¾ÑÑж кÑÑÑÑлн ÑÑжй / ÑÑÑÑ Ð¶Ð¹Ð¸Ð³Ð¶ Ñ Ð¾ÐµÑÑ Ð¿Ð½ÑÑи
ййжÑÑ ÑÐºÐºÑ ÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑÑ ÑÑмлпаедÑ
о аÑÑ Ð¿Ð»ÑÑм! ÑÑÑÑÑ Ð½Ð¼ ойп ÑÑбÑÐ¸Ð½Ð·Ð¸Ñ Ð³Ñ Ñ ÑÑдк Ñипа ÑÐ·Ñ ÑÑÑжÑÑмÑл Ñдйй жидде ÑÑÑÑÑÑ ÐµÑÑÑÑммлз иÑÑ Ð¹Ñзй Ñ Ð°ÐºÑз Ð¸ÐºÑ ÑÑÑз ÑкÑÑ ? бÑÑа пÑодвижение изданиÑ
Wednesday, February 18, 2009 - 12:14 am
ÐовÑй ÑпоÑоб Ð´Ð°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð½Ð° кандидаÑа на поÑÑ ÐÐ»Ð°Ð²Ñ Ð³. Химки
ÐовÑй ÑпоÑоб “наказаÑÑ” ÑÐµÑ , кÑо поÑмел ÑÑаÑÑвоваÑÑ Ð² вÑбоÑной кампании не на ÑÑоÑоне дейÑÑвÑÑÑей влаÑÑи изобÑели пÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð¾Ñ ÑаниÑелÑнÑе оÑÐ³Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð³.о. Химки.
Ð ÑководÑÑвÑÑÑÑ Ð½Ðµ ноÑмой закона, а ÑÑей-Ñо “волей” ÑоÑÑÑдники милиÑии ÑеÑили “пÑовеÑиÑÑ” вÑе ÑиÑмÑ, внеÑÑие денежнÑе ÑÑедÑÑва в избиÑаÑелÑнÑй Ñонд неÑдобнÑÑ ÐºÐ°Ð½Ð´Ð¸Ð´Ð°Ñов.
ÐаÑалиÑÑ “пÑовеÑки” Ñ ÑелеÑоннÑÑ Ð·Ð²Ð¾Ð½ÐºÐ¾Ð² – где диÑекÑоÑ, ÑколÑко Ñеловек ÑабоÑÐ°ÐµÑ Ð½Ð° ÑиÑме. ÐоÑле Ñего поÑледовали “пиÑÑма ÑÑаÑÑÑÑ” Ñ Ð¿ÑоÑÑбой пÑедоÑÑавиÑÑ Ð²ÑÑ Ð±ÑÑ Ð³Ð°Ð»ÑеÑÑкÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ÐºÑменÑаÑиÑ, ÑÑÑедиÑелÑнÑе докÑменÑÑ ÑиÑмÑ, и даже, план ÑкÑпликаÑии ÐТÐ.
Такие запÑоÑÑ Ñ Ð¸Ð¼ÐºÐ¸Ð½Ñким ÑиÑмам ÑаÑÑÑÐ»Ð°ÐµÑ 1 оÑдел ÐпеÑаÑивно-ÑозÑÑкной ÑаÑÑи â 9 УпÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ налоговÑм пÑеÑÑÑплениÑм ÐУÐÐ ÐоÑковÑкой облаÑÑи за подпиÑÑÑ Ð½Ð°ÑалÑника подполковника милиÑии Ð.Ð. ЯзÑкова.
РвÑÑ ÑÑо в Ñо вÑемÑ, когда ÐÑÐµÐ·Ð¸Ð´ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð´Ð°Ð» пÑÑмое Ñказание пÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð¾Ñ ÑаниÑелÑнÑм оÑганам о пÑекÑаÑении вÑÐµÑ Ð½ÐµÐ·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð½ÑÑ Ð¿ÑовеÑок малого и ÑÑеднего бизнеÑа. С ÑÑо ÑелÑÑ Ð²Ð½ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ñ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð² ФедеÑалÑнÑй закон “РмилиÑии” – из ÑÑаÑÑи 11 ÑÑого закона иÑклÑÑÐµÐ½Ñ Ð¿ÑнкÑÑ 25 и 35, на оÑновании коÑоÑÑÑ Ñанее пÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð¾Ñ ÑаниÑелÑнÑе оÑÐ³Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð¸Ð¼ÐµÐ»Ð¸ пÑаво пÑовеÑÑÑÑ ÑинанÑово-Ñ Ð¾Ð·ÑйÑÑвеннÑÑ Ð´ÐµÑÑелÑноÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑедпÑиÑÑий.
Ðидно, об изменениÑÑ Ð´ÐµÐ¹ÑÑвÑÑÑего законодаÑелÑÑÑва меÑÑнÑе пÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð¾Ñ ÑаниÑелÑнÑе оÑÐ³Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð½Ðµ ÑведомленÑ. Рне ÑмоÑÑÑÑ ÑелепеÑедаÑи Ñ Ð²ÑÑÑÑплениÑми ÐÑезиденÑа.
ÐÐ¾Ð¶ÐµÑ Ð±ÑÑÑ, ÑÑа пÑбликаÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð²Ð¸Ð³Ð½ÐµÑ Ð¸Ñ Ðº иÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð»Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñказаний ÐÑезиденÑа, а Ñакже к изÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ ÑоблÑÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð´ÐµÐ¹ÑÑвÑÑÑего законодаÑелÑÑÑва